Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
BMC Public Health ; 23(1): 22, 2023 01 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2196197

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Lockdown restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic have reduced the number of injuries recorded. However, little is known about the impact of easing COVID-19 lockdown restrictions on the nature and outcome of injuries. This study aims to compare injury patterns prior to and after the easing of COVID-19 lockdown restrictions in Saudi Arabia. METHOD: Data were collected retrospectively from the Saudi TraumA Registry for the period between March 25, 2019, and June 21, 2021. These data corresponded to three periods: March 2019-February 2020 (pre-restrictions, period 1), March 2020-June 2020 (lockdown, period 2), and July 2020-June 2021 (post easing of restrictions, period 3). Data related to patients' demographics, mechanism and severity of injury, and in-hospital mortality were collected and analysed. RESULTS: A total of 5,147 traumatic injury patients were included in the analysis (pre-restrictions n = 2593; lockdown n = 218; post easing of lockdown restrictions n = 2336). An increase in trauma cases (by 7.6%) was seen in the 30-44 age group after easing restrictions (n = 648 vs. 762, p < 0.01). Motor vehicle crashes (MVC) were the leading cause of injury, followed by falls in all the three periods. MVC-related injuries decreased by 3.1% (n = 1068 vs. 890, p = 0.03) and pedestrian-related injuries decreased by 2.7% (n = 227 vs. 143, p < 0.01); however, burn injuries increased by 2.2% (n = 134 vs. 174, p < 0.01) and violence-related injuries increased by 0.9% (n = 45 vs. 60, p = 0.05) post easing of lockdown restrictions. We observed an increase in in-hospital mortality during the period of 12 months after easing of lockdown restrictions-4.9% (114/2336) compared to 12 months of pre-lockdown period-4.3% (113/2593). CONCLUSION: This is one of the first studies to document trauma trends over a one-year period after easing lockdown restrictions. MVC continues to be the leading cause of injuries despite a slight decrease; overall injury cases rebounded towards pre-lockdown levels in Saudi Arabia. Injury prevention needs robust legislation with respect to road safety measures and law enforcement that can decrease the burden of traumatic injuries.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Trauma Centers , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control
2.
New Zealand Journal of Medical Laboratory Science ; 75(2):110-114, 2021.
Article in English | CINAHL | ID: covidwho-1366103

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a compliance tool that can be used by internal auditors to audit the conformity status of the use of Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device examination kit when ISO 15189:2012 accreditation is specified. The objectives include the identification of relevant conformance requirements in Clauses 4 (Management requirements) and 5 (Technical requirements) of ISO 15189:2012 and specific requirements for accreditation from accreditation bodies relating to areas of audit and the development of Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device examination kit conformity evaluation checklists for internal auditing. Methods: The relevant conformance requirements in Clauses 4 and 5 of ISO 15189:2012 and specific requirements for accreditation from 83/101 (82 %) accreditation bodies in 80/249 (32 %) countries were identified as specific audit criteria for Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device examination kit conformity evaluation checklists for reagents, test device and reference equipment. Results: A total of 22/1515 (1.5 %) conformance requirements relating to the use of Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device examination kit was identified in Clauses 4 and 5 of ISO 15189:2012, and specific accreditation requirements for calibration of reference equipment were identified and selected from 12/83 (14.4 %) accreditation bodies in 12/80 (15 %) countries;together these requirements were used to develop conformity evaluation of Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device examination kit checklists (n = 4) and an interpretation checklist. Conclusions: The present study has provided a practical contribution to existing knowledge of ISO 15189:2012 accreditation compliance management by providing internal auditors with a reasonably practicable approach to conduct comprehensive determination of conformity status of the use of Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device examination kit in accordance with ISO 15189:2012 and specific requirements for accreditation.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL